Post by account_disabled on Jan 2, 2024 1:33:33 GMT -5
Aof equality it is claimed that the criticized law created a privilege for the Autonomous Directorate for Nuclear Activities DrobetaTurnu Severin and a discrimination between the creditors of this authority and the creditors of other autonomous authorities in the country because for the creditors of the Autonomous Regime for Nuclear Activities the possibility of reducingnonpayment of their claims was established and the creditors of other autonomous regencies have their claim rights intact. Or granting.
A privileged position to the right of claim of individuals contravenes art. para. in its Country Email List component related to the prohibition of privileges in relation to art. para. of the Constitution the thesis regarding the equal guarantee and protection of the right to private property Decision of the Constitutional Court no. of December . . It is also stated that in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights it was ruled that although a state authority could not invoke the lack of liquidity to justify the refusal to execute a conviction exceptionally it is admitted that a delay in execution could be justified by special circumstances even if the rule is that of execution within a reasonable time.
This delay must not last forever so as to affect the very substance of the right protected by art. paragraph of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms Decision of the in the Burdov Case against Russia. However by Law no. the legal framework was created through which the state exempts itself from paying its legal obligations. . At the same time it is specified that although according to the constitutional provisions claims on the state are guaranteed in reality by Law no. the apparently legal framework was created by adopting some privileges for the Autonomous Directorate for Nuclear Activities so that the.
A privileged position to the right of claim of individuals contravenes art. para. in its Country Email List component related to the prohibition of privileges in relation to art. para. of the Constitution the thesis regarding the equal guarantee and protection of the right to private property Decision of the Constitutional Court no. of December . . It is also stated that in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights it was ruled that although a state authority could not invoke the lack of liquidity to justify the refusal to execute a conviction exceptionally it is admitted that a delay in execution could be justified by special circumstances even if the rule is that of execution within a reasonable time.
This delay must not last forever so as to affect the very substance of the right protected by art. paragraph of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms Decision of the in the Burdov Case against Russia. However by Law no. the legal framework was created through which the state exempts itself from paying its legal obligations. . At the same time it is specified that although according to the constitutional provisions claims on the state are guaranteed in reality by Law no. the apparently legal framework was created by adopting some privileges for the Autonomous Directorate for Nuclear Activities so that the.